Are You Ready to Bet Your Retirement on Private Equity? Why a New Rule Could Put Your 401(k) at Risk

---

Introduction

You’ve saved for decades, making smart choices, avoiding hype, and staying the course. But what if the rules suddenly changed—and your hard-earned 401(k) became a target for high-risk, high-fee investments?

A new executive order could open the floodgates for private equity in retirement accounts, and on the surface, it might sound like opportunity. But ask yourself: Are you really getting access to the same deals as billionaires—or are you being sold the leftovers?

Most people assume their 401(k) is protected, diversified, and grounded in long-term fundamentals. But this policy shift introduces a dangerous blind spot: complex, opaque, and often unregulated private equity products that can lock up your money, charge sky-high fees, and fail to deliver.

This post explores the real risks behind this policy, the ugly truth about private equity returns, and why retirees should think twice before embracing Wall Street’s next big pitch.

---

What’s Actually Happening? The Executive Order Behind the Headlines

The Push Toward “Alternative” Investments in 401(k)s

On August 7, 2025, a new executive order was issued by the Trump administration to expand access to private equity and other “alternative” investments inside 401(k) plans. The goal? According to the administration: to give workers the same opportunities as wealthy investors.

But this framing ignores the enormous knowledge gap, access imbalance, and structural risks that differentiate a high-net-worth investor from the average retiree.

“This is like telling everyday drivers they can now race Formula One cars—without the training, the track, or the safety protocols.”

The Fine Print: You’re Not Getting Private Equity’s Best Deals

While the executive order talks about “access,” the reality is different. Most 401(k) participants won’t get the crème de la crème of private equity deals. Instead, they’ll be funneled into mass-market funds with limited transparency, poor liquidity, and fees layered like an onion.

The Real Risks of Private Equity in Retirement Accounts

Underperformance Is the Norm—Not the Exception

Private equity is often marketed as a high-return opportunity, but the numbers tell a different story.

• A respected analysis by Christoph Jaeckel found that the average private equity fund underperforms the S&P 500 by approximately 3% per year, net of fees—even though it may outperform before fees. Once costs are factored in, the promise of outperformance fades quickly.

And it gets worse.

Most private equity performance studies suffer from survivorship bias—they exclude failed funds that quietly disappeared, skewing returns higher than what everyday investors actually experience.

Academic research by Kaplan & Schoar further supports this reality: net-of-fees private equity returns are roughly comparable to, or slightly below, public markets like the S&P 500.

“You’re not just trying to beat the market—you’re trying to beat it while paying 5–7x higher fees, accepting illiquidity, and giving up transparency.”

Have you considered what happens if your 401(k) ends up in a “loser” fund? There’s no easy exit—and no FDIC safety net.

The Fee Machine: 5–7x Higher Than Index Funds

The fees in private equity are not just high—they’re stacked:

• Management fee: Typically 2% annually
• Performance fee (carried interest): 20% of profits
• Portfolio company fees: Legal, consulting, deal fees (often undisclosed)

Compare this to the average 401(k) index fund with fees around 0.05%–0.20%.

According to the SEC, private equity’s fee structure can eat up 25%–50% of gross returns over time.

Illiquidity and Lockups: Your Money is Trapped

Private equity funds typically require:

• 5–10 years of commitment before liquidity
• Strict penalties for early withdrawal (if allowed at all)
• Minimal reporting transparency

This is in direct conflict with what most retirees need: flexibility, income, and liquidity.

“Need to rebalance during a downturn? Too bad. The money’s locked up.”

Who Wins—and Who Doesn’t

Winners

• Private equity firms (who collect fees, regardless of performance)
• Plan providers that offer packaged alternative investment products
• High-net-worth investors who still get first dibs on elite funds

Losers

• Everyday 401(k) participants without visibility, control, or influence
• Pre-retirees who need clarity, liquidity, and low-cost strategies
• Small investors who mistake access for opportunity

Most people assume they’re stepping onto the same playing field—but the game is rigged, and you’re not holding the rulebook.

What the Data Really Says About Private Equity Returns

Dispersion Is Destiny

• According to Preqin, the average net IRR for PE over 10 years is 12.9%, but:
  • Top-quartile funds earn 17%+
  • Bottom-quartile funds earn under 6%
• Once you subtract the fee load, many mid-tier funds underperform public index funds

Survivorship Bias in the Marketing

Private equity performance stats often exclude failed funds that never raised follow-on capital. This skews the data and creates the illusion of consistent outperformance.

What Should Retirees Do Instead?

Stick with What Works—But Get Strategic

• Focus on low-cost index funds with global diversification
• Prioritize tax efficiency through Roth conversions and asset location
• Use dynamic withdrawal strategies to reduce sequence of return risk
• Ensure liquidity for long-term care and unexpected expenses

Don’t Let Wall Street’s Hype Replace Your Judgment

“Retirement is not the time to swing for the fences—it’s the time to protect the base.”

---

Key Takeaways

• Private equity isn’t built for retirement portfolios—it’s illiquid, opaque, and fee-heavy
• The best private equity deals are inaccessible to most 401(k) investors
• Data shows wide performance gaps between top and bottom funds—guess which one you’ll be offered
• This policy benefits Wall Street far more than Main Street
• Low-cost, transparent investment strategies still outperform over time—without the gamble